China hypothesized
Fuente: Conocimiento del astrologo para conocer horoscopo y ciencia.
10 del 2 de 2012
We're on the anniversary of the birth of the People's Republic of China,
formerly called the sleeping giant, becoming the largest lender in the United
States and the bride to which all European countries to seek liquidity
problems.
China's economy between 1979 and 2004, growth averaged 9.6 percent a year,
and now despite the global uncertainties continue with an unstoppable advance,
and Brazil joined India of the few that are growing so obvious that it is
sustained as well as sustainable.
Changes in the global economy that are plaguing Europe and the majority of
citizens in the United States does not make a dent in a country that feeds on
the weaknesses of the system of social protection in Europe, and the
sensitivity of investors to risks, a simple analysis of their ability to
introduction into the world economy reveals must have known his power to impose
its own business philosophy, it is not adapting China, the world is China.
Now we talk of cutting the welfare state in Europe, benefits, salaries,
etc.. At the same time begin to hear news about Chinese workers demanding
social and economic improvements, for instance, a worker in a Chinese factory
supplier of Nike would have to work 4,500 years with your current salary to
earn as much as Mark Parker, director of the famous multinational in 2006, not
to mention that they are not counted overtime and working long hours, far more
than it does a worker in any part of Europe, the successful expression of
"work like Chinese."
I am not mistaken when he said that in a globalized future that awaits us
will tend to be somewhere between the terms "union" and the Chinese
state "welfare" office in the West, and this no doubt due to the
control and direction of those who control the global economy, of course, and
as is evident lately we are not referring to the political class and it
occurs to me to raise this hypothesis:
A globalized economy but poorly distributed across countries, rich and very
poor some others, have limited economic potential, its boundaries are the
purchasing power of its inhabitants and quantity, part of the world working for
the other gives a sum less than of both production and the cost march in
parallel.
Now imagine that European low purchasing power which is beginning to happen
and China rises, Brazilian, and Indian, which is beginning to happen, then we
will have a much wider market, a more efficient productivity for large firms
and above all a level of influence and control much more important, and this is
summarized in more power by mega corporations and those who support them, no
doubt investors, large investors are that after all are leading the way political
and social Europe through the securities markets, and are trained specifically
to influence the events that are transforming the European economy to undermine
markets.
Therefore the growth of China's economy is a value for large companies who
see it as an opportunity, benefiting the Chinese nation to turn this world
leader in converting Europe can be relegated to a territory with strong
historical basis medium-grade consumer but without actual economic power to the
people, the moral frustrated by debt and the U.S. would tend to become the most
important military ally of the Asian country, we'll see.
